Utah Court Rules – Published for Comment
The Supreme Court and Judicial Council invite comments about amending these rules. To view the proposed amendment, click on the rule number.
To submit a comment or view the comments of others, click on “Continue Reading.” To submit a comment, scroll down to the “Leave a Reply” section, and type your comment in the “Comment” field. Type your name and email address in the designated fields and click “Post Comment.”
Comments cannot be acknowledged, but all will be considered. Comments are saved to a buffer for review before publication.
Posted: August 15, 2024
URJP014. Reception of referral; preliminary determination. Amend. The proposed revision to paragraph (a) intends to clarify when a probation officer may send a delinquency referral to a prosecutor. This change conforms with Utah Code sections 80-6-303.5 and 80-6-304.5. The changes also include several stylistic changes and a restructuring of paragraphs (a) and (c).
Posted: August 7, 2024
The Utah Judicial Council invites comments to the following Model Utah Criminal Jury instructions. The comment period expires September 20th, 2024. Although these instructions are subject to a comment period, they are now ready for use. The Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee will consider all comments made during the comment period and may revise the instructions as appropriate.
The Judicial Council also encourages judges and practitioners to continuously share their experiences using any of the published instructions with the Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee.
CR430 – Jury Unanimity – Single Offense in More than One Way
CR432 – Jury Unanimity – Evidence of More Occurrences than Charges
CR1008 – Driving With any Measurable Controlled Substance in the Body
CR1101 – Failure to Respond to an Officer’s Signal to Stop (Class A Misdemeanor)
How to view text of the proposed model civil jury instructions:
Click the link to the instruction above or follow this link to see all proposed jury instructions and submit comments: https://legacy.utcourts.gov/utc/muji-comment/.
How to submit comments:
You can comment and view the comments of others by clicking on the “CONTINUE READING” link associated with each body of instructions. After clicking on that link, you will be asked for your name, which is required, and your email address, which need not be your real address. The comment website is public. Although all comments will be considered, they will not be acknowledged with a response.
After submitting your comment on the webpage, you may get an error message. If so, your comment has been delivered to a buffer and it will be published as soon as possible.
You may submit comments directly through the website or to Bryson King at brysonk@utcourts.gov.
One method of submitting a comment is sufficient. If you email a comment, please list the relevant instruction(s) in the message line and include your comment in the message text, not in an attachment.
How to view published Model Criminal Jury Instructions:
Visit https://legacy.utcourts.gov/muji/
How to view the Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee’s work:
Posted: July 23, 2024
URCP005 AMEND. The proposed amendments to this rule take into account the new filings systems and ways in which service and filing can be accomplished. The major amendments include removing the list from paragraph (a), updating the methods of service found in paragraph (b), and a revised paragraph (d) for certificates of service. Amendments were also made to conform to the rules style guide, format for other rules, and to use plain language.
URCP 001 AMEND. The proposed amendments to this rule are to conform to the rules style guide. It was reviewed along with Rule 81 after the drafting of the new Rules of Business and Chancery Court Procedure.
URCP081 AMEND. The proposed amendments to this rule were proposed after the drafting and finalization of the new Rules of Business and Chancery Court Procedure, and to conform to the rules style guide.
URCP007A AMEND. The proposed amendments to rules 7A(h) and 37(b) were made to clarify the enforcement mechanisms found in rule 37(b) as opposed to using the motion to enforce order and for sanctions process found in rule 7A. This amendment also includes a proposal to delete subparagraph (b)(6) from Rule 37. The amendments to Rule 37 will be forthcoming as the proposals include additional language changes for subpoenas that are being made in conjunction with several other URCP rules.
URCP060 AMEND. The proposed amendments to this rule are to clarify the language found in subparagraph (d) and update the numbering found in subparagraph (b) to conform to the rules style guide.
Posted: July 11, 2024
URAP019 Rule 19. Extraordinary relief. Amend. The Committee proposes amending Rule 19 to update the reference to Rule 23C.
URAP021 Rule 21. Filing and service. Amend. The Committee proposes amending Rule 21 to: (1) remove the language “and accompanied by proof of service” in paragraph (c) because that language is unnecessary where paragraph (e) provides the requirements for proof of service; and (2) change “contact information” to “user accounts” to clarify that electronic service will occur on parties that have a user account.
URAP023C Rule 23C. Motion for emergency relief. Amend. The Committee proposes amending Rule 23C to: (1) change the term “emergency relief” to “expedited review” throughout the rule and further clarify that this rule cannot provide any substantive relief, but provides only a means for obtaining expedited review of a pending motion, petition, or appeal; (2) clarify the content length of a motion for expedited review; and (3) clean-up language for clarity and consistency.
URAP029 Rule 29. Oral Argument. Amend. The Committee proposes amending Rule 29 to add that a party may not reserve more than five minutes for rebuttal during oral argument.
Posted: July 11, 2024
URE.0615 Excluding Witnesses. Amend. Changes are proposed to conform closely (but not completely) to recent amendments made to FRE 615. The proposed amendments clarify that witnesses may be excluded “from the courtroom or from a place where they can see or hear the proceedings;” specify that only “one” “officer or employee of a party that is not a natural person” be exempt from exclusion “if that officer or employee has been designated as the party’s representative by its attorney;” and add a new subparagraph (b) to clarify that the court may make other orders to “prohibit disclosure of trial testimony to excluded witnesses,” and to “prohibit excluded witnesses from accessing trial testimony.”