Utah Courts
URE Rule 106 (Rules of Evidence)
Rule 106. Remainder of or Related Statements.
If a party introduces all or part of a statement, an adverse party may require the introduction, at that time, of any other part — or any other statement — that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time. The adverse party may do so over a hearsay objection.
2025 Advisory Committee Note. This rule has been amended to reflect amendments recently made to Federal Rule of Evidence 106. This is the federal rule, verbatim.
2011 Advisory Committee Note. The language of this rule has been amended as part of the restyling of the Evidence Rules to make them more easily understood and to make class and terminology consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility. This rule is the federal rule, verbatim.
Original Advisory Committee Note. This rule is the federal rule, verbatim. Utah Rules of Evidence (1971) was not as specific, but Rule 106 is otherwise in accord with Utah practice.
| Empty Table |
|---|